January 21, 2015

While discussing the declining quality of independent film...


Posted by
Labels: , ,

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous1/21/2015 12:30 PM

    "Independant" as opposed to "tie-in", I suppose. :-/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1/21/2015 1:12 PM

    He's clearly forgotten about Pacific Rim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diane1/21/2015 4:14 PM

      I was thinking about that great recent indie film "Guardians of the Galaxy", but you've probably never heard of it.

      Delete
    2. SallyP1/21/2015 4:54 PM

      Snicker.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous1/21/2015 5:00 PM

    "Independent" I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1/22/2015 10:25 AM

      I know he's using the word wrong, but I totally know what he means.

      Delete
    2. ZenDragon988/25/2015 11:47 PM

      Great 'Princess Bride' reference, by the way.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous1/23/2015 9:27 AM

    I think he means "Independent" the same way Minecraft or Super Meat Boy is "Independent". Small budget, big payoff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diane1/23/2015 11:27 AM

      I don't think either Fight Club or the first Matrix qualify as "small budget". I think what he means is "not part of a pre-existing franchise or based on a book or comic book or TV show or...".

      Delete
    2. Lee1/25/2015 3:37 AM

      But "Fight Club" was based on a novel.

      Delete
    3. Diane1/26/2015 12:32 PM

      Either he didn't know that - as I didn't - or I'm wrong then. There goes my record...

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)