Nah, at best they'll have Batman get cancer, then punch it in the face instead of going through chemotherapy.
The second movie would have been far less impressive if they'd killed Batman in the first. Just sayin' is all.
I hope the third movie is nothing but Batman dying over and over and over, from Bane to slipping in his shower.
Well, it's got Bane, so there's a good chance that Bats will, at the very least, get his spine broken.
He'll finally choke on the gravel he swallows to get his voice to sound like that.
CLEARLY this woman has no idea what she's talking about, does NOT belong in a comic book store, deserves to have her spine broken, should be beaten to death with a crowbar and then blown up.
and that should happen to her just because she's wearing a PBR t-shirt.
"I'll only see a movie if I know how it's going to end. It also needs a good rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and my cousin has to say it's good too."
She should then have to punch her way back into reality, fight a spider clone, get sent to Hell, get fired into space, and then go back in time to fight her counterpart from Earth Alpha Prime 55.
The "first batman" movie was from 1966.
Wearing a PBR shirt is even more "ironic" than drinking it.
Then the bomb would have exploded as he was running away from the nuns with it in his hands.
"The "first batman" movie was from 1966."Incorrect. The FIRST Batman movie was made in 1943, starring Lewis Wilson and Douglas Croft.
You win all the Internets!
So her idea of a good time is sitting around for two hours, patiently waiting for Batman to die? Either she's the most bitter person on the planet or she's secretly the Joker.
The Joker does not want him to die! Killing Batman would ruin the fun.
This is some sort of time-space conundrum.. she'll ONLY go see it if they kill Batman at the END... so unless it's spoiled for her.. she'd have to sit through it to find that out.. OR, by her watchng it, Batman will die..???? *headexplode*
Tigerama - should she also sell her marriage to Satan?The 1943 and 1949 movie serials are kind of amazing. The first one is chock-full of unbelievable WWII-style racism. The second one lacks that particular drawback(so far; I'm not QUITE done with it yet), but it also has much lower production values than its predecessor. (It's predecessor, it should be noted - the one with the better production values - has rubber bats on visible strings flopping around the Batcave like they're having seizures. They stepped DOWN from that when doing the sequel. Batman loses his paunch, but the costume goes from looking like something my wife could sew together to looking like something I could sew together. This is a steep downgrade.)
Simpsons did it.
OK, I'll be that guy - "shoulda did"? Jeez.....
It's cool how they reinvent Batman on screen every 20 years.Batman Serials: 1940sBatman Adam West: 1960sBatman Keaton, etc: 1980s (with 90s sequels).Batman Current: 2000s (with sequels in the 10s)One for each generation.